An honest look at surgery, injections, and medication — and how they compare with conservative, non-surgical care.
Before you commit to surgery, injections, or long-term medication for back or neck pain, it's worth understanding how each option really works — the benefits, the trade-offs, and how they compare with conservative, non-surgical care. We believe in giving you an honest picture so you can make the decision that's right for you, together with your doctor. Every figure on this page is tied to the published source it came from, with its date and its limits.
Is back surgery right for me?
Surgery can be the right answer for certain serious problems — but it's a major step, and for many types of back and neck pain it isn't the only option.
Pros
Can address clear structural problems, like significant nerve compression or instability
May relieve severe, progressive, or persistent symptoms when other care hasn't helped
Worth knowing
Invasive, with anesthesia, recovery time, and real surgical risks
Results vary — not everyone gets complete or lasting relief
Some patients need additional procedures later
Usually recommended only after conservative options have been tried
What the research shows
Nguyen et al., Spine (2011) — 1,450 Ohio workers' compensation claimants, injured 1999–2001 and followed through 2006
Of 725 people who had lumbar fusion for disc degeneration, disc herniation, or radiculopathy, 26% had returned to work two years after their surgery. Of 725 people managed without surgery, 67% had returned within two years of their injury. The surgical group averaged 1,140 days off work versus 316, had a 27% reoperation rate, and 11% were permanently disabled versus 2%. Among the surgical patients, the average daily dose of opioid medication was 41% higher after surgery than before it.
Scope and limits About this study
It is not a head-to-head trial, and the two percentages are not measured from the same starting point: the surgical group was measured from the date of surgery — on average about 20 months after the injury — and the non-surgical group from the date of injury. The groups were matched only on age, sex, and diagnosis, and they differed in ways that independently predict returning to work: 92% of the surgical group had legal representation, versus 75% of the comparison group. That is why the authors describe an association rather than a cause, and called for randomized trials. The figures cover fusion for degenerative disc conditions — not fusion for instability, deformity, or fracture, and not the general population. They are still worth raising with your surgeon: ask what return-to-work and reoperation rates look like for your diagnosis and your procedure.
“Laser spine surgery” is marketed as a quick, minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. Some minimally invasive procedures genuinely help carefully selected patients — but this corner of the market has a difficult history, and it is worth knowing before you pay out of pocket.
Pros
Smaller incisions and, in some cases, a shorter recovery than open surgery
May be appropriate for specific, well-chosen conditions
Worth knowing
Often expensive and frequently not covered by insurance — you may be paying out of pocket
Independent evidence that it outperforms standard surgery is limited
Marketed aggressively, often direct to patients — always get an independent second opinion
What the research shows
David Armstrong, “Laser Spine Surgery More Profitable Than Google Sees Complaints,” Bloomberg News, 4 May 2011
Bloomberg examined Laser Spine Institute, a Tampa surgery chain that billed itself online as “the largest spine center in the world.” The company often charged $30,000 per procedure, and Medicare patients paid a $17,900 “facility fee” out of their own pockets, because Medicare would not pay that fee to free-standing ambulatory surgery centers — Medicare’s average facility fee for the same procedure in a hospital setting was $3,535. The company’s chief operations officer told Bloomberg that in-house surveys showed positive outcomes for more than 87% of patients, but that the institute had struggled to get independent academics to examine those results.
Laser Spine Institute closed in 2019
The company shut its four remaining surgery centers — Tampa, Cincinnati, Scottsdale, and St. Louis — at the close of business on Friday 1 March 2019, telling more than 500 staff nationwide that day that operations would cease. Two weeks later, on 14 March, it and fifteen affiliated entities assigned their assets to an assignee for the benefit of creditors under Chapter 727 of the Florida Statutes — a state-court liquidation, not a reorganization. No company trades under that name today. We mention it because the marketing outlived the company: if a clinic is selling you a branded “laser” procedure, ask who owns it, what the total cost is, and what independent outcome data exists.
Scope and limits On financial incentives
A 2010 Health Affairs analysis of Florida claims data from 2003–2005 (Hollingsworth et al.) found that physicians who took an ownership stake in an ambulatory surgery center went on to perform a higher volume of procedures. Worth knowing what was and was not studied: the five procedures were carpal tunnel release, cataract removal, colonoscopy, knee arthroscopy, and ear-tube placement. No spine procedure was included, so this is not evidence about laser spine surgery or about any individual surgeon. It is an association, and there are ordinary explanations for it. We mention it only because asking whether the person recommending an elective procedure has a financial interest in the facility performing it is a reasonable question — and one you are entitled to ask us about our own recommendations too.
What about epidural steroid shots?
Steroid injections can calm inflammation around an irritated nerve. They can be a useful short-term tool, but they come with trade-offs.
Pros
Can temporarily reduce inflammation around an irritated nerve
Sometimes provide enough relief to take part in rehab and exercise
Worth knowing
Relief is usually temporary, and averaged across trials the benefit is small
Bleeding, infection, and dural puncture are risks of the procedure itself
Repeated injections have been associated with a dose-related vertebral fracture risk
Treats the symptom, not the underlying mechanical cause
What the research shows
Chou et al., Annals of Internal Medicine (2015) — systematic review, evidence search closed May 2015
This review pooled the placebo-controlled trials: 30 in radiculopathy and 8 in lumbar spinal stenosis, analysed separately. For radiculopathy — nerve pain radiating down the leg — the six trials that measured pain within the first two weeks found an average reduction of about 7.6 points on a 0-to-100 pain scale compared with placebo. The authors noted this fell below the threshold they had set in advance for a clinically important difference, and that no benefit was still detectable beyond about two weeks. For lumbar spinal stenosis, the eight available trials showed no clear benefit, though the authors described that evidence as limited.
Mandel et al., Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2013) — retrospective cohort, Level III evidence
In older adults being treated for lumbar spine conditions, researchers compared 3,000 patients who received at least one lumbar epidural steroid injection with 3,000 propensity-matched patients who received none. Each successive injection was associated with a 21% higher likelihood of a vertebral body fracture (a factor of 1.21; 95% CI 1.08–1.30). The authors concluded these injections should be approached cautiously in patients already at risk of osteoporotic fracture.
Scope and limits How firm is that evidence
Because the study looked back through existing records rather than assigning treatment, it cannot show that the injections caused the fractures — patients who receive more injections also tend to have more advanced spinal disease and more overall steroid exposure. And a 2018 Mayo Clinic systematic review (Kerezoudis et al., Pain Medicine) found increased vertebral fracture risk in only one of the two studies that had examined it, so the question is not settled. If an epidural steroid injection has been recommended to you, raise bone health with the physician who prescribed it — and do not stop or delay prescribed treatment based on this page.
FDA-approved labeling — DEPO-MEDROL (methylprednisolone acetate), WARNINGS: Neurologic; required by the FDA Drug Safety Communication of 23 April 2014
Epidural injection of corticosteroids is not an FDA-approved use. Off-label use is legal and routine in pain management — the FDA approves medications, it does not regulate how physicians practise. Since 2014 the FDA has required injectable corticosteroid labeling to state: “Serious neurologic events, some resulting in death, have been reported with epidural injection of corticosteroids. Specific events reported include, but are not limited to, spinal cord infarction, paraplegia, quadriplegia, cortical blindness, and stroke… The safety and effectiveness of epidural administration of corticosteroids have not been established, and corticosteroids are not approved for this use.” The FDA called these problems rare but could not calculate a rate: the warning rests on 131 cases reported voluntarily between 1997 and 2014, with no record of how many injections were performed. Risk also varies with the type of steroid used, the route, and the level of the spine. Discuss it with the physician offering you the procedure.
What about pain pills?
Over-the-counter and prescription medications can take the edge off pain, but they work by masking symptoms rather than resolving the cause.
Pros
Can provide short-term relief and help you stay functional while you heal
Widely available and non-invasive
Worth knowing
Mask pain without addressing what's causing it
Side effects, and — with some medications like opioids — a risk of dependence
Not a long-term solution on their own
Free Reports
Discover How Spinal Decompression is Changing the Way Neck and Back Pain Have Been Treated without Drugs, Pills, Shots, or Surgery.
Enter your details and we'll send the reports straight to your inbox — 100% free, no obligation.
Our approach
A conservative-care-first approach
At Hans Chiropractic & Injury Center, we start with the least invasive options that can get you real, lasting results — chiropractic adjustments, non-surgical spinal decompression, laser therapy, and physiotherapy. If your exam shows you'd be better served by surgery, injections, or medical management, we'll tell you honestly and help coordinate your care. Our goal is the right treatment for you — not the most treatment.
To be clear about where we stand: this clinic does not perform surgery or epidural injections, and we do not prescribe medication. Many patients get real relief from those options. Treat this page as one chiropractic clinic’s perspective, and check it against the advice of the physician recommending your treatment.
This page is general educational information, not medical advice. Every case is different — always discuss your treatment options with your own physician before making a decision. The studies cited describe average results in specific populations; individual results vary.
Reviewed by Dr. Joe Hans, DC — Hans Chiropractic & Injury Center, Norcross, GA
Get this free report 
